Index
Archives
Submit News
Community
The Wonderwall
Add You Gamertag
Blogs
Videos
Games
Articles
Reviews
Screenshots
Competitions
Links
Play Three
About Us
How do you like your movies?
Blue-Ray Disc
Downloadable
DVD
 

2 people have voted.


 
Index » Articles Send this page to a friend
Battlezone
Posted by wyndorf666, 18 days ago
 Rating Preview
 Story
 0.1 
 Lastability
1.0
 Playability
2.0
 Originality
1.0
 Graphics
4.0
 Sound
1.0

Sigh. Atari are a thorn in my side. Just when I think they couldn’t release anymore rehashed ‘Evolved’ tosh - along comes Battlezone straight out of 19 frickin’ 80! I’m almost tempted to believe my ever faithful editor pleads to get his hands on Atari game codes just so he can have me review them. It’s like he gets off on it!

Here we go. Battlezone from Atari was originally released in 1980 and at the time - I am assured (2 years before my time) - it was groundbreaking. Featuring 3D graphics and a first person view Battlezone was also the basis of an army training simulator. The idea was and still is, to blow up enemy tanks, missiles and UFO’s. Whether or not the enemies were really in control of these UFO’s is still up for debate.



The Xbox LIVE version is a straight port of the original, although a crud ‘Evolved’ version is also included. The evolved version of the game plays exactly the same. Strangely not the default setting, but the best setting is the twin analogue controls. Left stick for the left runner and the right stick for the right runner. Right trigger/A fires your tanks cannon - and that’s pretty much it. The classic versions visuals remain vector style and naturally have dated badly. The evolved version only builds on the vector style a little. It really looks like all they’ve done is colour in the shapes with some green and black…there’s also cloudy looking explosions and a new 3rd person view - which just makes things harder. This is primitive death match style gameplay - a style that to be fair, hasn’t changed that much in nearly 30 years.

Battlezone is tough, I gave up several hours of my life and only came away with a top score of 29,000. The original by far the better of the two games, is also the tougher of the two. I understand tanks are never gonna be doing loop the loops and barrel rolls, but as a video game, I expect some boundaries of realism to be sacrificed in favour of adding a little bit of fun. You have a radar which will fish out any enemies within firing range, but more often than not, by the time you’ve turned your tank around 360 degrees you’re in a thousand different pieces. It’s frustrating and rather dull.

Sparse on options in the single player mode (on both games) I head online to do battle with other people. Admittedly, I really thought this could’ve been a laugh and a half. Going beyond the call of duty (a first for Atari’s pathetic ‘Evolved’ games) Battlezone’s multiplayer has been given the life line of Xbox LIVE vision compatibility. Two finger salutes all round. OK, my slight optimism was shot down in flames when after 3 days of actively searching - I couldn’t find one single game to join, nor did anyone join mine. Although slightly annoyed that I really needed to play online for the benefit of this review, I was and am ecstatic that my fellow gamers, are finally taking a stand and saying “NO! Stop it Atari, we will not buy this rubbish anymore!” Maybe if the guys from Stainless Games who produced this port offered to come on camera and face people, it would probably sell by the bucket load. Hell, 400 points is a small price to pay for getting the chance to hurl abuse face to face at the jokers that put this together. Although, to be fair a job’s a job. Maybe I should aim my distain at the joker who gave this the green light in the first place.

OK, short and sweet. Not that I feel anyone is going to need deterring from purchasing Battlezone, but if this review/rant even persuades just one person to keep their wallet zipped up, then my work here is done.

 Our Rating for Battlezone
0.1
Story
N/A
1.0
Lastability
Dire. It’s very very basic stuff and becomes tiresome after ten minutes. Online mode is here - but nobody wants to play.
2.0
Playability
To a degree, there is something here to ‘master’, but it’s so shallow and slow you’d be better off teaching yourself a trade.
1.0
Originality
Yes, I say this every time. The ‘classic’ version of the game was very original - but my originality score always references the ‘Evolved’ edition. It’s 28 friggin years old!
4.0
Graphics
Contradictory to the above, I’m using the ‘classic’ version to score the graphics. Believe it or not, the simple vector green on black form 1980 - is better looking than the horrible, misty, lifeless mess that is the evolved versions visuals.
1.0
Sound
Again, what little noise there is - is better in the original.
1.0
Overall
In 2008 this is as bad as it gets. Great in a museum and a great backstory behind the original development and it’s team, but nowadays Battlezone is an old horse, and it’s time to load up your gun - and take it behind the barn.
Comments
Rules
1. No cursing or swear words: Use proper language to express yourself.
2. No flooding or spamming the comment system, abuse will result in a ban.

You may not post comments as a guest. Please register or login to your account.
 
 
1
Call of Duty 4 Q&A
Views:
58242
2
Lost The Game (Via Domus)
Views:
27923
3
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
Views:
18175
4
Assassin’s Creed - hands on...
Views:
13109
5
Overlord Q&A
Views:
8999
Boom Blox
Iron Man
Inside the GTA IV Strategy Guide
Iron Man
Lost Cities
GTA IV
Bliss Island
Mr Driller
Battlezone
Rocketmen: Axis of Evil
Search the site:

 0 Active Users

Index | Online Now | Submit News | Contact | Pages | Blogs | Forums | Downloads | Video | RSS
CCMS Gaming v4 - Nextgen Skin
Top Games:  Fifa 2008 | Pokemon Diamond/Pearl | Guitar Hero II | Spiderman 3 (All Formats) | Sega Rally | Command & Conquer: Tiberium Wars | Folklore | Halo 3 | The Simpsons | Timeshift